Is design objective or subjective?
The debate between two influential designers Wim Crouwel and Jan Van Toorn is one of the most famous debates on objectivity and subjectivity in Graphic Design. The debate focuses on three main areas: the social and professional role of the designer, the value of grids and typographic tradition, and the function of the graphic designer when designing for museums and art galleries.
Crouwel favours an objective approach, representing the ideal of the designer as a 'selfless messenger', whilst Van Toorn favours a subjective approach to design and supports the notion of the designer as an interventionist, in favour of criticism and intervention.
The use of grids is a fundamental element in Crouwel's practice as a graphic designer. This makes use of an analytical approach, which is said to result in strong appeals to current opinions in social and cultural topics that can have powerful communicative effects. He believes that grids benefit from clarity and transparency of such information.
German graphic designer and typographer, Otl Aicher supports a similar objective approach to Crouwel in the use of grids. His work for the 1972 Munich Olympics uses a strict and precise structure in the form of a 45 degree grid which Aicher developed specifically for pictograms to represent these Olympic games. This helped to create an objective and universal language for every country taking part in the games.
On the other hand, Van Toorn rejects this use of grids, suggesting that this means "the country is inundated by waves of trademarks and house styles and everything looks the same". For this reason, he believed that the use of the grid does not serve any purpose in communication.
Designer, Paul Mijksenaar supports Van Toorn's idea of subjectivity in design. He believes that "airports in English speaking countries should only use English in their sign systems and never a second language as to not patronise the traveller who doesn't speak English". His view on multilingual signs is therefore not based on the functionality of the sign system itself, but his own subjective viewpoint.
Experimental Jetset agree with this view in that elements of a subjective nature that go beyond the idea of functionality should also be considered within design, such as aesthetics and conceptual elements.
However, Van Toorn does agree that grids can sometimes be highly effective in communication, but this should not be used as the only approach towards such design. Likewise, Experimental Jetset believe that "most sign systems have the appearance of an objective, functional construction, but under the surface can have many subjective motives".
Bruno Munari also suggests that when signs are used in fields, such as music and visual poetry, these can be more expressive of ourselves (subjectivity). Although, many signs must remain objective, such as road signs, in that we have been conditioned to know what they mean objectively and if not followed these can have serious consequences.
In conclusion, there are many arguments to suggest that Graphic Design can be both subjective and objective. In my opinion, Graphic Design is not either or, but a mixture of both objective and subjective elements. In this sense, I agree with Bruno Munari's approach to design, in suggesting that signs in specific fields can be considered as subjective. For example, tramp signs which can only be understood by those of that same group to warn or let others know of certain situations. However, signs such as road traffic signs must remain objective and universal, as the same signs are taught around the world and if these are disobeyed they could cause some serious accidents on the road. In the words of Van Toorn "grids can sometimes be highly effective for conveying a message, but you should not promote their use as the only way of design". Designers, such as David Carson disobeyed such rules of the grid, however as a result, produced some effective pieces of design. Although, this in itself could be debatable, as many have varying opinions about Carson's work.